Skip to content
Signet

infosys.com

Receivers are told to reject mail that fails authentication for this domain.

Enforced

Receivers are told to reject mail that fails authentication for this domain. Keep watching aggregate reports so a new sending service does not silently start failing.

131 DNS queries · 849 ms

Fix these first
  1. 1
    No MTA-STS policy
    Publish a TXT record at _mta-sts.infosys.com and a policy file at https://mta-sts.infosys.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
  2. 2
    No TLS-RPT record
    Publish 'v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:<address>' at _smtp._tls.infosys.com.

Identity ·DMARC

v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=r; rua=mailto:[email protected];
Policy
reject
Coverage
100%
Alignment
dkim=r spf=r

Identity ·DKIM

111 selectors probed

defaultDefault (OpenDKIM / cPanel / Plesk)RSA 2048

Identity ·SPF

Worst-case evaluation across every include.

v=spf1 ip4:216.251.56.130 ip4:216.251.50.7 ip4:122.98.14.31 ip4:122.98.10.32 ip4:122.98.14.30 ip4:122.98.14.32 ip4:122.98.10.31 ip4:122.98.14.33 ip4:122.98.10.33 ip4:122.98.132.40 ip4:144.49.240.0/21 include:_spf-a.infosys.com -all
DNS lookup budget5 / 10
  • include:_spf-a.infosys.com
  • include:ipreomail.com
  • include:spf.tmes.trendmicro.com
  • include:spfb.tmes.trendmicro.com
  • include:spfc.tmes.trendmicro.com

Findings (4)

LowNo MTA-STS policy›

Without MTA-STS, mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext by an active network attacker, because SMTP's STARTTLS is opportunistic by default.

What to do

Publish a TXT record at _mta-sts.infosys.com and a policy file at https://mta-sts.infosys.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.

RFC 8461

LowNo TLS-RPT record›

Sending servers have no address to report TLS failures on mail to your domain, so transport problems stay invisible to you until someone complains.

What to do

Publish 'v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:<address>' at _smtp._tls.infosys.com.

RFC 8460

InfoEligible for BIMI›

Your DMARC policy is already enforcing, which is the hard prerequisite for BIMI. Publishing a logo is now largely a branding exercise.

What to do

Publish an SVG Tiny PS logo plus a VMC, then add a default._bimi record.

InfoEligible for DANE›

Your zone is signed, which is the hard prerequisite for DANE. Publishing TLSA records for your MX hosts would let sending servers pin your certificates without relying on the public CA system.

What to do

Publish a TLSA record at _25._tcp.<each MX host> matching your MX certificate.

RFC 7672

Show 8 passing checks
PassAggregate reporting is configured›

Aggregate reports are requested at: [email protected].

PassDMARC policy is p=reject›

Mail failing authentication is rejected outright. This is the correct end state.

PassSPF lookup count is healthy (5/10)›

Worst-case evaluation stays within the limit with headroom to spare.

PassSPF ends in '-all' (hard fail)›

Unauthorised hosts are explicitly rejected. This is the correct end state.

Pass1 DKIM key(s) published›

Found at: default.

PassSelector 'default' uses a 2048-bit RSA key›

Key length meets current guidance.

PassZone is signed and validates›

A validating resolver reported this zone's answers as authenticated. Resolvers that validate DNSSEC reject a tampered answer for your SPF, DKIM and DMARC records rather than pass it on. This also makes DANE available to you.

PassCertificate issuance is restricted by CAA›

Only amazon.com, digicert.com, emsign.com may issue certificates for this domain, so a certificate for your mail hosts or your MTA-STS policy endpoint from any other authority would be a mis-issuance. Wildcard certificates are limited separately, to amazon.com, digicert.com, emsign.com.

RFC 8659

Transport and zone

Where your mail lands, and whether the DNS carrying your records can be trusted.

MXinfosyslimited.in.tmes.trendmicro.eu
Reverse DNSforward-confirmed on every host
MTA-STSnot published
TLS-RPTnot published
BIMInot published
DNSSECsigned · chain validates
CAAamazon.com, digicert.com, emsign.com · wildcard: amazon.com, digicert.com, emsign.com
DANEno TLSA records

This is the configuration. It is not the whole picture.

A DNS scan cannot tell you whether infosys.com’s mail actually aligns, because alignment is decided per message at the receiver. Collect DMARC aggregate reports to see every source sending as this domain.

infosys.com scores A for SPF, DKIM and DMARC · Signet